AI Regulation

UK AIAI Regulation

In the UK, our AI Compliance Advisors are significantly influencing the evolving landscape of AI regulation. Their expertise is central to the development of national AI regulatory frameworks, aligning with the UK’s unique legal and technological context. This involvement is crucial as the UK navigates its post-Brexit regulatory environment, seeking to establish itself as a leader in AI innovation while ensuring responsible and ethical AI use.

What is UK AI Regulation?

While the UK does not have a single, unified AI regulation framework yet, here’s an overview of the most up-to-date developments on AI regulation across key areas:

1. Existing Frameworks and Sector-Specific Guidance

  • Data Protection: GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 already place restrictions on how AI systems can use personal data, focusing on areas like fairness, transparency, and accountability.
  • Sectoral Regulators: Regulators in specific sectors (e.g., Ofcom for communications, the Financial Conduct Authority) are issuing guidance on how AI should be used ethically and responsibly within their domains.

2. Landmark AI Policy Paper

  • National AI Strategy (2021): Outlines the UK Government’s high-level approach, emphasizing pro-innovation principles with a risk-based approach to regulation.
  • AI Governance White Paper (July 2022): Proposes a set of cross-sectoral principles for AI governance:
    • Ensure AI is used safely and securely
    • AI systems are technically robust
    • Standards and accountability mechanisms exist
    • AI is used fairly and transparently
    • Clear roles and responsibilities for AI oversight
    • AI aligns with fundamental rights

3. The AI Regulation Proposal (Ongoing)

  • Inspired by the EU Approach: The UK is considering an adaptation of the EU’s proposed AI Act, creating a risk-tiered system of regulation. This is still under consultation and development.
  • Potential Focus Areas: Likely to include high-risk AI systems (e.g. in hiring, law enforcement), transparency requirements, and ensuring human oversight.

Why is AI Regulation Important for the UK?

The Bank of England (including the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a discussion paper (DP) 5/22 – Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning – in October 2022 to further their understanding and to deepen dialogue on how AI may affect their respective objectives for the prudential and conduct supervision of financial firms. The DP is part of the supervisory authorities’ wider programme of work related to AI, including the AI Public Private Forum (AIPPF), and its final report published in February 2022, the FS2/23 – Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

A summary of the key points includes:

•        A regulatory definition of AI is deemed unnecessary by many respondents, who favor principles-based or risk-based approaches focusing on AI’s characteristics and risks.

•        Given the rapid evolution of AI, regulators should consider creating ‘live’ regulatory guidance that is periodically updated with best practices.

•        Ongoing industry engagement, like the AIPPF, is vital and could serve as a model for continuous public-private collaboration.

•        The regulatory landscape regarding AI is seen as complex and fragmented. Greater coordination among domestic and international regulators is needed.

•        There is a consensus on the fragmentation of data regulation. More regulatory alignment is needed, particularly in areas concerning fairness, bias, and the management of protected characteristics.

•        Regulation and supervision should prioritize consumer outcomes, especially in ensuring fairness and ethical aspects.

•        The increasing use of third-party models and data raises concerns, necessitating more regulatory guidance. The relevance of DP3/22 to the UK financial sector is noted.

•        AI systems’ complexity across various firm areas suggests that a unified approach, especially between data management and model risk management, is beneficial.

•        While the principles in CP6/22 (now SS1/23) are seen as sufficient for AI model risk, some areas need strengthening or clarification.

•        Existing firm governance structures, like the SM&CR, are considered adequate for addressing AI risks.


Financial Institutions (Banks, Insurers, Asset Managers)
  • Lending & Credit Decisions: AI algorithms used for credit scoring, loan approvals, and risk modelling will require greater scrutiny. Regulations may demand explainability for AI decisions, bias prevention, and clear processes for individuals to challenge outcomes.
  • Fraud Detection & Anti-Money Laundering: Institutions will need to ensure AI-powered systems for AML compliance meet accuracy and transparency standards. This may impact their efficiency and the data they need to collect.
  • Customer Service & Advising: Chatbots and robo-advisors will need to comply with suitability requirements, ensure fairness in customer interactions, and have clear disclosures about their use of AI.
  • Trading & Investment Management: Algorithmic trading and AI-powered investment strategies will face greater oversight. Regulators may look at pre-trade testing, market abuse detection, and audit trails of AI-driven decision-making.
Fintech Companies
  • Innovative Disruption: Fintechs heavily reliant on AI (e.g., credit scoring platforms, digital lenders) are likely to be most affected. While regulation validates their approach, it could also curb speed-to-market and create compliance burdens.
  • Big Tech in Finance: Large technology companies entering financial services will also need to adapt. While they may have the resources for compliance, regulations could create barriers to entry and stifle competition.
Asset Managers
Commodity Houses

How Can We Help?

The main factors contributing to AI-related risks in financial services are centered around three critical phases of the AI lifecycle: data, models, and governance. Risks that originate at the data stage can influence the model stage, subsequently leading to more extensive challenges at the firm’s level, particularly concerning the management of AI systems. The way AI is employed in financial services can lead to various outcomes and risks at each of these three stages (data, models, and governance), all of which are significant for the oversight roles of supervisory authorities. Nonetheless some of our client can get ahead with following up on the below:

The following steps can summarise it:


AI Ethics Consultations

T3 AI compliance advisors can offering consultations on ethical AI use and help to develop ethical guidelines for AI deployment.


Technical Auditing

Our Technical Auditors can run audits to ensure AI systems are built and operating in compliance with legal and ethical standards and identify biases and other issues in AI algorithms


Data Governance

Our financial data experts can assist in the establishment of robust data governance frameworks and ensuring data privacy and security compliance.


Documentation and Reporting

T3 can help document AI systems, processes, and data handling procedures for regulatory compliance and assist in the preparation of compliance reports and other required documentation.


Algorithm Transparency and Explainability

Our AI modellers can help enhance the transparency and explainability of AI algorithms in order to create clear, understandable explanations of how AI systems make decisions.


Impact Assessments

This involves conducting AI impact assessments to evaluate the potential risks and benefits of AI projects and identifying potential negative impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies.


Third-party Vendor Assessment

We work with numerous vendors and can help with assessing the compliance of third-party vendors and partners in the AI ecosystem and ensuring that external partners adhere to required legal and ethical standards.


Customized Compliance Solutions

T3 can develop tailored compliance frameworks and solutions based on the specific needs and risks associated with a company’s AI projects and implementing compliance monitoring and management systems.


Incident Response Planning

Our senior compliance advisors can work with your legal council to prepare companies for potential legal or ethical issues related to AI and develop incident response plans to manage and mitigate risks.

Want to hire 

AI Regulation Expert? 

Book a call with our experts