European Developments: European Commission Publishes FAQs on CSDDD

Introduction
On 25 July, the European Commission published a comprehensive set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This document aims to clarify the Directive’s intricacies, offering guidance for companies subject to its provisions. The CSDDD is an essential piece of legislation aimed at promoting sustainable corporate practices across the European Union and beyond, ensuring accountability in supply chains and placing environmental and social concerns at the heart of business operations.

This article will explore the key takeaways from the FAQs, touching on the phased implementation timelines, the exclusion of certain financial services, and the scope of the “chain of activities” concept. We’ll also discuss the applicability of the CSDDD to both EU and non-EU companies, shedding light on how it affects the broader business landscape.

What is the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)?

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is part of a broader EU initiative aimed at bolstering sustainability in corporate governance. Its main objective is to encourage companies to respect human rights and the environment throughout their supply chains. This directive obligates companies to identify and, where necessary, prevent, end, or mitigate adverse impacts of their activities on human rights (such as child labor) and the environment (such as pollution or biodiversity loss).

CSDDD places a significant emphasis on corporate responsibility, pushing for transparency and ethical operations from raw material sourcing to end product sales. By doing so, the directive aims to align corporate activities with broader EU goals related to sustainability and climate change mitigation.

Importantly, the CSDDD applies to a range of companies, including both EU-based firms and non-EU firms that have a significant business presence in Europe. This approach ensures that even multinational companies are held to a uniform standard, creating a level playing field and pushing for global improvements in corporate sustainability practices.

Key Details from the FAQs

Timeline for Transposition and Phased Application

The FAQs clarified the timeline for the implementation of the CSDDD. Member States are required to transpose the directive into national law by 26 July 2026. This means that each EU country must create its regulations to enforce the directive, ensuring uniform application across the Union. However, the directive will not apply to all companies simultaneously; it will have a phased application based on company size and turnover, with full implementation stretching from 2027 to 2029.

The phased approach is designed to give companies of varying sizes adequate time to comply with the new requirements. Larger companies will need to adapt sooner, while smaller enterprises will be given additional time, recognizing the varying capacities to implement these often complex processes. This flexibility is particularly important given the potential administrative and financial burdens that smaller firms may face in meeting the directive’s requirements.

Scope of CSDDD and Exclusions

Another key detail from the FAQs concerns the exclusion of certain financial services from the directive’s material scope. Specifically, financial services provided in the context of relationships with clients are excluded from CSDDD, although this exemption is scheduled for review within two years after the directive’s entry into force. This means that, while the financial sector is largely involved, there are specific contexts where due diligence requirements do not apply.

The rationale behind this exclusion is to reduce the immediate burden on financial institutions while the impact of their services on sustainability goals is further assessed. This phased evaluation allows the Commission to adjust the directive as needed to ensure it remains practical and impactful.

Despite this exclusion, financial undertakings are not completely off the hook. They are required to adopt and put into effect a climate transition plan. This plan must include absolute emission reduction targets, particularly addressing scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, which are emissions occurring in the value chain of the reporting company, including both upstream and downstream activities. This requirement underscores the EU’s commitment to ensuring that financial institutions play an active role in driving the green transition.

Requirements for Climate Transition Plans

Financial undertakings, under the CSDDD, must create climate transition plans that align with the EU’s broader goals of achieving climate neutrality by 2050. A critical component of these plans is the inclusion of absolute emission reduction targets for scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions where appropriate. Scope 3 emissions often represent a significant share of a company’s carbon footprint, particularly in the financial sector, where investments and loans indirectly contribute to global emissions.

This requirement is a significant move by the European Commission, emphasizing that financial institutions must not only focus on their direct operational emissions but also on the broader impact of their financing activities. It is expected that this will drive financial entities to more carefully scrutinize their clients’ environmental impact, thereby fostering a ripple effect of sustainability throughout the corporate landscape.

Understanding the “Chain of Activities” Concept

Defining the Chain of Activities

The FAQs provide detailed clarification on the CSDDD’s concept of the “chain of activities.” This term refers to both upstream and downstream activities associated with a company’s operations. In simpler terms, upstream activities involve suppliers and sourcing of raw materials, whereas downstream activities relate to the use, distribution, and disposal of products.

This broad definition means that companies must consider the entire lifecycle of their products and services, from inception to end-of-life. For instance, a car manufacturer would need to assess the sustainability practices not only of their parts suppliers but also the impacts related to the use and eventual disposal of the vehicles they produce. This comprehensive view is designed to ensure that companies are not shifting responsibility to suppliers or customers but are taking full accountability for the entire value chain.

Derogation for Financial Undertakings

Interestingly, the concept of the “chain of activities” does not apply in the same way to financial services due to a specific derogation. The FAQs explain that financial undertakings are treated differently because their chain of activities involves the flow of capital rather than the production or handling of physical goods. This distinction highlights the unique nature of the financial industry, where the impact on sustainability is more indirect.

For example, while a manufacturing company might be directly responsible for pollution caused by its suppliers, a financial institution’s impact might be related to the carbon footprint of the companies it invests in. This indirect nature is one reason the EU has opted for a different approach, requiring financial companies to create climate transition plans instead.

Applicability to EU and Non-EU Companies

Criteria for Inclusion

One of the essential clarifications provided by the FAQs is that the CSDDD applies to both EU and non-EU undertakings. However, there are important differences regarding turnover and employee thresholds. EU-based companies are subject to the directive if they meet specific turnover or employee counts, while non-EU companies are included based on their turnover generated within the EU.

This distinction is designed to ensure that companies benefiting significantly from the European market are subject to the same sustainability obligations as their EU-based counterparts. By enforcing these standards on non-EU companies, the directive aims to avoid creating an uneven competitive environment and prevent non-EU companies from gaining an unfair advantage through less stringent sustainability practices.

Implications for Global Businesses

For global companies operating in the EU, the CSDDD represents a significant shift in how they must conduct their business. Non-EU companies that generate considerable revenue in the EU market will be expected to comply with the same due diligence requirements as European firms. This means that supply chains, regardless of their location, must adhere to the standards set out by the directive.

The implications are far-reaching, particularly for industries like manufacturing and mining, which often have complex, multinational supply chains. Compliance will require comprehensive audits, policy adjustments, and in some cases, a rethinking of supplier relationships. However, this also represents an opportunity for companies to differentiate themselves through robust sustainability practices, appealing to a consumer base that is increasingly concerned about environmental and social issues.

Practical Implications and Industry Reactions

Financial Undertakings and Compliance Challenges

For financial institutions, the requirement to adopt climate transition plans and include scope 3 emissions targets presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Scope 3 emissions are notoriously difficult to quantify, particularly for financial services, where emissions are often indirect and linked to investments and loans. Many financial institutions will need to develop new metrics and tools to assess their clients’ emissions accurately.

However, this requirement also positions financial undertakings as pivotal players in the fight against climate change. By incentivizing their clients to reduce emissions, financial institutions can leverage their influence to drive substantial change across numerous industries. The expectation is that this will create a cascade effect, promoting sustainability throughout the economy.

Broader Industry Reactions

The response to the CSDDD and its associated FAQs has been mixed across different industries. Many larger corporations, particularly those already engaged in sustainability initiatives, have welcomed the directive as a necessary step towards harmonizing standards across the EU. They see it as an opportunity to showcase leadership in corporate responsibility and to leverage sustainability as a competitive advantage.

Conversely, some industries, particularly those heavily reliant on complex supply chains or those with limited experience in sustainability reporting, have raised concerns about the administrative burden and potential costs associated with compliance. For smaller companies, the phased application is a welcome reprieve, providing additional time to prepare and adapt.

---

The publication of the FAQs on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive marks an important milestone in the EU’s journey towards fostering corporate accountability and sustainability. By clarifying key aspects of the directive, the European Commission has provided companies with a clearer roadmap for compliance, emphasizing both environmental and social governance responsibilities.

For businesses operating in the EU—whether headquartered within its borders or beyond—the directive represents both a challenge and an opportunity. Companies will need to reassess their supply chains, refine their sustainability practices, and, in the case of financial undertakings, adopt new strategies for reducing scope 3 emissions. The path to compliance may not be straightforward, but the potential benefits in terms of reputation, regulatory alignment, and contribution to global sustainability efforts are considerable.

The CSDDD aims to create a fairer, more sustainable market, ensuring that all companies doing business in the EU play their part in addressing pressing global challenges. By understanding and embracing these new requirements, companies can help lead the way towards a more sustainable future.

Interested in speaking with our consultants? Click here to get in touch

 

Some sections of this article were crafted using artificial intelligence technology