Operational Resilience in Australia
Prudential Standard CPS 230230
Enhancing Operational Risk Management and Resilience
Prudential Standard CPS 230, introduced by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), is designed to enhance operational resilience and risk management for APRA-regulated entities, including banks, insurers, and superannuation funds. The standard, set to take effect on 1 July 2025, aims to ensure that financial institutions can withstand, adapt to, and recover from operational disruptions while maintaining critical services.
Operational risks—ranging from cyber incidents and IT failures to third-party risks and supply chain disruptions—have grown in complexity due to digital transformation, increased reliance on outsourced services, and evolving threat landscapes. APRA has emphasized that improving operational resilience is essential to safeguarding financial stability and protecting consumers from systemic failures (APRA, 2023).
Key Requirements of CPS 230
CPS 230 establishes several mandatory risk management practices that regulated entities must implement. The requirements emphasize a proactive and structured approach to operational risk and resilience.
1. Operational Risk Management Framework
- Institutions must develop a comprehensive operational risk management framework that identifies, assesses, mitigates, and reports operational risks.
- The framework should align with the broader risk management strategy of the institution and be proportionate to its size, complexity, and nature of operations.
- The framework must be reviewed regularly to ensure its effectiveness in managing evolving risks (APRA, 2023).
2. Business Continuity Management (BCM)
- Institutions are required to maintain robust business continuity plans (BCPs) to ensure they can operate critical functions during disruptions.
- Regular testing, including scenario analysis and simulation exercises, must be conducted to evaluate resilience capabilities.
- Key risks addressed by BCM include cyberattacks, natural disasters, IT system failures, and operational errors (APRA, 2023; RBA, 2022).
- APRA mandates that institutions define and document their tolerance levels for operational disruptions, ensuring that they can resume operations within an acceptable timeframe.
3. Service Provider Management
- Given the increasing reliance on third-party service providers, CPS 230 imposes stringent requirements on outsourcing and third-party risk management.
- Institutions must conduct due diligence before engaging material service providers and ensure they comply with regulatory and security standards.
- Contracts must clearly define service level agreements (SLAs), security obligations, and contingency plans in the event of provider failure.
- Ongoing monitoring, periodic risk assessments, and audits of third-party providers are required to ensure continued compliance (APRA, 2023; ASIC, 2022).
4. Incident Management and Reporting
- Entities must establish an incident management framework that enables swift and effective responses to operational disruptions.
- Institutions are required to report significant incidents to APRA in a timely manner, detailing the nature of the event, its impact, and mitigation steps taken.
- Cybersecurity breaches, technology failures, and fraud events fall under the scope of incident reporting requirements (APRA, 2023; OAIC, 2021).
5. Resilience Testing
- Institutions must conduct regular resilience testing to evaluate their ability to withstand and recover from severe operational disruptions.
- Testing scenarios should include cyberattacks, major third-party service failures, data breaches, and supply chain disruptions.
- APRA encourages financial institutions to use industry-wide resilience exercises and stress testing frameworksto benchmark their preparedness against sector peers (APRA, 2023; BIS, 2022).
WHO DOES IT IMPACT?
This standard is scalable, allowing entities to implement measures proportionate to their size, complexity, and operational footprint. Small to medium-sized institutions have flexibility in their approach, while larger entities must adopt more sophisticated frameworks to meet heightened regulatory expectations (APRA, 2023).
CPS 230 applies to all APRA-regulated entities, ensuring that different financial institutions adopt operational resilience measures suited to their scale and complexity. These include:
Timeline CPS 230 (Where are we?)
Initial Preparations
Institutions must assess their current operational risk management frameworks and identify gaps relative to CPS 230 requirements.
Effective Date
By this date, all APRA-regulated entities must fully comply with CPS 230 requirements.
APRA has stressed the importance of early adoption to mitigate risks and ensure a smooth transition without disruptions (APRA, 2023).
Why is CPS 230 Important?
1. Strengthening Operational Resilience
- Operational risks, such as cyber incidents, IT failures, and third-party vulnerabilities, pose significant threats to financial institutions.
- CPS 230 mandates a proactive approach to risk management, ensuring institutions can prevent, respond to, and recover from operational disruptions.
2. Safeguarding Consumer Trust
- By enforcing rigorous risk management practices, CPS 230 enhances public confidence in the financial system.
- Continuity of critical services, even during crises, reinforces an institution’s reputation and consumer trust (APRA, 2023; ASIC, 2022).
3. Mitigating Systemic Risks
- A failure in one financial institution can create ripple effects across the broader financial system.
- CPS 230 helps prevent cascading failures by requiring institutions to operate within a resilient framework that safeguards the stability of the financial sector (BIS, 2022).
4. Promoting Regulatory Compliance
- CPS 230 aligns Australian financial institutions with global best practices for operational risk management.
- Compliance ensures competitiveness in international markets and reduces exposure to regulatory penalties (APRA, 2023; RBA, 2022).
5. Responding to Emerging Threats
- The rise of cyber threats, digital transformation, and increased reliance on third-party service providers necessitates modernized risk management approaches.
- CPS 230 adopts a forward-looking approach to ensure financial institutions remain adaptable and resilient against evolving operational risks (APRA, 2023; OAIC, 2021).
Detailed Breakdown of CPS 230 Requirements
A comprehensive overview of operational risk, business continuity, service provider management, and incident management.
Operational Risk Management Framework
Institutions must:
- Define operational risk categories, including personnel, processes, technology, and external events (APRA, 2023).
- Establish a risk governance structure with assigned roles and responsibilities for managing operational risks (Deloitte, 2023).
- Integrate the framework into enterprise-wide risk management strategies, ensuring alignment with regulatory and business objectives (PwC, 2023).
- Conduct regular risk assessments and update risk controls based on emerging threats and vulnerabilities (KPMG, 2023).
- Implement internal reporting mechanisms to track risk exposures and mitigation actions (APRA, 2023).
Business Continuity Management
Business continuity plans (BCPs) must:
- Include detailed recovery strategies for critical operations, identifying core business functions and acceptable downtime limits (APRA, 2023).
- Identify internal and external dependencies, including key suppliers, technology systems, and personnel (Deloitte, 2023).
- Establish contingency measures for different disruption scenarios, such as cyberattacks, natural disasters, and infrastructure failures (PwC, 2023).
- Be tested regularly through simulations and independent reviews to ensure effectiveness and responsiveness (KPMG, 2023).
- Provide clear communication protocols for internal teams, regulators, and customers in the event of a disruption (APRA, 2023).
Service Provider Management
APRA-regulated entities must:
- Conduct thorough due diligence on third-party service providers before engagement, assessing their ability to meet operational standards (APRA, 2023).
- Include detailed contractual terms regarding performance expectations, monitoring mechanisms, compliance requirements, and termination conditions (Deloitte, 2023).
- Implement ongoing monitoring frameworks, requiring periodic performance reviews and risk assessments of service providers (PwC, 2023).
- Establish contingency plans for the failure of critical service providers, ensuring minimal disruption to business operations (KPMG, 2023).
- Report significant service provider-related risks or disruptions to APRA as part of the compliance framework (APRA, 2023).
Incident Management
Institutions must:
- Implement real-time monitoring tools to detect and assess operational incidents promptly (APRA, 2023).
- Develop clear escalation processes for incident reporting, ensuring swift response and mitigation (Deloitte, 2023).
- Establish structured incident response teams with defined roles and responsibilities for managing disruptions (PwC, 2023).
- Maintain detailed incident logs to analyze trends and improve resilience against future occurrences (KPMG, 2023).
- Provide timely and comprehensive reports to APRA on significant incidents, including root cause analysis and corrective actions taken (APRA, 2023).
8 Key points of CPS 230
1
Comparative Analysis with Global Standards
While CPS 230 aligns with international regulatory trends, a comparison with similar frameworks offers deeper insights into global best practices:
- United Kingdom: The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have implemented Operational Resilience requirements, focusing on Impact Tolerances and testing methodologies.
- European Union: The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) introduces stringent ICT and third-party risk management rules.
- United States: The Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC emphasize resilience in financial market infrastructure and cybersecurity preparedness.
Understanding these differences helps multinational financial institutions harmonize compliance efforts across jurisdictions.
2
Practical Implementation Guidance
While CPS 230 mandates operational risk management, institutions require a structured roadmap for implementation:
- Operational Risk Taxonomy: Define categories such as cyber threats, IT failures, and third-party dependencies.
- Integration with Existing Frameworks: Align CPS 230 requirements with ISO 22301 (Business Continuity) and NIST (Cybersecurity Framework).
- Scenario-Based Testing: Implement real-world stress testing to assess resilience to systemic shocks and cyber incidents.
- RegTech Solutions: Utilize AI-driven compliance tools to automate risk assessments and reporting mechanisms.
3
Real-World Case Studies and Examples
Illustrating past operational failures can contextualize CPS 230’s importance:
- Banking Sector: Cyberattacks on payment systems disrupting financial transactions.
- Insurance Industry: Data breaches leading to policyholder information leaks.
- Superannuation Funds: Third-party administrator failures delaying pension payments.
Learning from past incidents allows financial institutions to proactively address vulnerabilities before regulatory deadlines.
4
Industry-Specific Implications
Each financial sector faces unique challenges under CPS 230:
- Banks: Digital banking disruptions, payment system resilience, and fraud prevention.
- Insurers: Claims processing continuity, climate risk exposure, and third-party service management.
- Superannuation Funds: Custodian and administrator oversight, investment operational risk, and member service continuity.
Tailoring CPS 230 compliance to sector-specific risks enhances regulatory alignment and operational preparedness.
5
Enforcement and Penalties for Non-Compliance
Understanding APRA’s enforcement approach is crucial:
- Supervisory Oversight: APRA will conduct resilience testing, audits, and targeted reviews.
- Penalties for Non-Compliance: Institutions may face regulatory interventions, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
- Remediation Expectations: APRA expects proactive risk mitigation and board-level oversight on operational resilience efforts.
6
Technological & Cybersecurity Aspects
CPS 230 mandates robust cybersecurity controls and resilience strategies:
- Advanced Cybersecurity Measures: Adoption of zero-trust architecture, real-time threat intelligence, and penetration testing.
- AI and Automation: Leveraging AI-driven risk assessment tools to identify and mitigate operational vulnerabilities.
- Cloud and Third-Party Risk Management: Implementing stringent vendor assessments and multi-cloud resilience strategies.
7
APRA’s Supervisory Expectations & Industry Consultation Feedback
APRA has engaged in industry consultation to refine CPS 230 implementation:
- Regulatory Guidance: Additional clarifications on incident reporting thresholds and risk assessment methodologies.
- Industry Concerns: Challenges in meeting third-party resilience requirements and balancing compliance costs.
- Potential Refinements: Adjustments to proportionality measures for smaller institutions.
Keeping track of APRA’s evolving guidance ensures institutions remain compliant and adaptive to regulatory changes.
8
Next Steps & Recommendations
To ensure timely CPS 230 compliance, financial institutions should:
- Conduct a Gap Analysis: Identify shortcomings in existing risk frameworks against CPS 230 requirements.
- Enhance Third-Party Oversight: Update contracts, conduct audits, and implement resilience plans for key service providers.
- Board and Senior Management Engagement: Ensure leadership is actively involved in risk governance and strategic decision-making.
- Early Testing and Simulation Exercises: Validate business continuity plans through regular stress tests and industry-wide resilience drills.
Want to hire
CPS 230 Expert?
Book a call with our experts
