AI Regulation (Updated to 2025)

Japan

AI Innovation with Ethical Considerations

Japan balances AI governance with a focus on AI innovation, human rights, and the common good. It encourages privately-led self-regulation, but actively steers policy in a direction that ensures that AI technologies are used ethically and responsibly. In this context, incentives are made for organizations to act responsibly in managing digital contents group within AI systems.

Overview of AI Regulation and Governance in Japan

HUMAN-CENTRIC APPROACH

Japan has taken a human-centric and principle-based approach to AI governance, aimed at promoting innovation, so long as AI technologies are consistent with the values, ethics and trust in society. In contrast to the more prescriptive models of AI regulation, Japan’s governance structure is characterized by flexibility and proportionality, with adaptations based on sectors and with a view to seamless integration of emerging AI technologies. The Government has been proactive in working with industry and academia to develop robust guidelines and protocols that strike a balance between risk mitigation and economic growth.

Adopted in 2019 and regularly updated, the Social Principles of Human-Centric AI are the foundation of Japan’s AI governance framework. Focusing on transparency, accountability, inclusivity and sustainability in AI usage, these principles ensure the responsible use of AI in a wide range of applications. Japan also aligns itself with the international norms and standards, such as the OECD AI Principles, to promote global interoperability and collaboration.

Key Guidelines:

Key Regulatory Components

What Does It Involve? 
  • Japan’s principles-based regulation provides overarching ethical guidelines rather than rigid legal mandates, allowing organizations to tailor their governance structures to specific AI applications. 
  • The framework emphasizes transparency, safety, human rights protection, and sustainability. 
  • Developers are encouraged to assess their AI systems’ societal and ethical impact, particularly in sensitive areas like healthcare, education, and public safety. 
Who Is Impacted? 
  • Developers, manufacturers, and service providers deploying AI technologies in critical or public-facing roles. 
  • Government agencies integrating AI into public services. 
When Is It Due? 
  • Guidelines are in effect, with periodic updates reflecting technological advancements and societal needs. 
Cost of Non-Compliance: 
  • Reputational risks, loss of public trust, and potential exclusion from government partnerships or funding opportunities. 

Data Privacy Compliance

What Does It Involve? 

AI systems must comply with the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), which governs data collection, usage, and sharing. Key provisions include: 

  • Cross-border data transfer restrictions. 
  • Enhanced individual rights, such as the ability to request explanations for AI-driven decisions. 
  • Stricter consent requirements for personal data use. 
  • Developers are also expected to follow data minimization principles, ensuring that only essential data is collected and processed. 
Who Is Impacted? 
  • Organizations using personal data to train or operate AI systems, especially in finance, healthcare, and retail sectors. 
  • Multinational companies engaged in cross-border data transfers. 
When Is It Due? 
  • The latest amendments to APPI became effective in 2022, with future refinements anticipated as AI technologies evolve. 
Cost of Non-Compliance: 
  • Fines up to JPY 100 million (~USD 700,000) for data breaches or violations, along with significant reputational damage. 

Risk-Based Approaches

What Does It Involve? 
  • Japan categorizes AI applications based on their societal, safety, and ethical impact: 
  • High-risk systems (e.g., autonomous vehicles, facial recognition, medical diagnostics) require rigorous risk assessments, testing, and certification. 
  • Low-risk systems, such as chatbots, are subject to fewer regulatory requirements but must adhere to ethical guidelines. 
  • Developers must conduct pre-deployment risk assessments to identify and mitigate potential harm. 
Who Is Impacted? 
  • Companies developing or deploying high-risk AI systems, especially in public safety, healthcare, and finance. 
  • Research institutions involved in AI innovation. 
When Is It Due? 
  • Risk management frameworks are currently implemented through the AI Utilization Guidelines and updated regularly. 
Cost of Non-Compliance: 
  • High-risk systems without proper safeguards may face operational bans, liability claims, and regulatory sanctions. 

Cross-Sector Collaboration

What Does It Involve? 
  • Japan’s AI strategy relies on active partnerships between government, academia, and industry to drive innovation and ensure ethical deployment. 
  • The AI Strategy 2023 outlines a roadmap for using AI in digital transformation, smart cities, healthcare, and disaster management. 
  • International collaboration includes alignment with the OECD AI Principles and active participation in the G7 AI Initiative. 
Who Is Impacted? 
  • Research institutions, startups, corporations, and policymakers working on AI advancements. 
  • Organizations engaged in cross-border AI projects or benefitting from government funding. 
When Is It Due? 
  • Ongoing, with regular updates to address emerging technologies and global developments. 
Cost of Non-Compliance: 
  • Organizations failing to participate may lose access to R&D funding, face limited market opportunities, and struggle with global interoperability. 

Want to hire 

AI Regulation Expert? 

Book a call with our experts

Hire US